Group 3 ethics project 1
The participating departments reflect the variety of mental health services: acute, rehabilitation, forensic, adolescent, geriatric and outpatient services.
Private for-profit mental health services are relatively limited. This requires taking precautions to prevent re-identification of anonymized data or unauthorized data collection, ensuring the accuracy of data, understanding the provenance of the data, and protecting it from unauthorized access and accidental disclosure. Participants were encouraged to bring up their own ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion. The use of coercion in mental health care Over the last years, the use of coercion in mental health services has received increasing attention. Reflection is arguably an essential feature of all professional development and professional competence [ 22 — 24 ]. The public good should always be an explicit consideration when evaluating tasks associated with research, requirements analysis, design, implementation, testing, validation, deployment, maintenance, retirement, and disposal. This means your description of the case will fit into, perhaps, questions two and three. Those involved with pervasive or infrastructure systems should also consider Principle 3. Situations involving conflicting value judgments appear to be particularly demanding, and the informants presented situations that challenged them in several ways. You don't have to be an expert, but you must have some research and evidence to support claims that you are making.
High quality computing depends on individuals and teams who take personal and group responsibility for acquiring and maintaining professional competence. Learning from each other is like seeing the elephant from different angles, one participant said.
They experience ethical challenges in areas like the use of formal as well as informal coercion, that they feel insecure about the legal framework for coercion, their identity and professional role, that they experience organisational difficulties and lack of resources, and the abuse of power and lack of professional competence among some colleagues [ 4647 ].
We explicitly invited more and less experienced ethics reflection group participants. This requires not only skills and tact from the facilitator, but in the long run, also from every team member.
Group 3 ethics project 1
If you prefer advertising topics, you might analyze a series of ads on one topic. Who should decide when and how to present the data? Finally, we as interviewers also did the training and represented the group of researchers involved in the intervention study, which may have created bias by influencing the group discussions, and our interpretation of the results e. Step 1 is more important than step 2, but with two people working on it you should be able to do a good job on both. Improved quality of the use of coercion through dealing better with ethical challenges related to the use of coercion The participants in this study report that the ethics reflection group may have contributed to the reduction of the use of coercive measures on the one hand and an improvement of the use of coercive measures on the other hand. Systematic ethics reflection can help health professionals develop an ethical language covering the challenges they face. Computing professionals are often entrusted with confidential information such as trade secrets, client data, nonpublic business strategies, financial information, research data, pre-publication scholarly articles, and patent applications. The IRB is a protective mechanism that community partners can use if they understand it and are part of the process of designing the research. Therefore, the use of coercion, is a complicated moral enterprise. Situations can be complex and confusing, which may make it difficult to put into words what is at stake [ 3 ]. Ethics reflection groups were offered to employees in order to share their experiences related to the use of coercion and to better deal with ethical challenges related to coercion [ 2 , 3 , 16 , 25 , 26 ]. The ethical guidelines built in to most IRBs rely largely on three core ethical principles: respect for persons, beneficence and justice. This article presents evaluation findings from part c. How to raise critical questions in a constructive way, without undermining safety and curiosity in the groups, is an important area for further research.
At the end of your work, you'll be the expert on this issue, so I expect to read in your work a lot that I don't know already. In addition, we explicitly instructed the participants not to focus on consensus but learn from different perspectives on the subject as usually happens within ethics reflection groups.
Ethical considerations in research
This requires taking precautions to prevent re-identification of anonymized data or unauthorized data collection, ensuring the accuracy of data, understanding the provenance of the data, and protecting it from unauthorized access and accidental disclosure. The Code includes principles formulated as statements of responsibility, based on the understanding that the public good is always the primary consideration. Many participants report that the deliberations in the reflection groups have helped them to develop a language describing the ethical challenges they face. A computing professional is responsible for evaluating potential work assignments. Participating in such deliberations makes health professionals more experienced in identifying ethical challenges. Outcomes include better handling of ethical challenges, better employee cooperation, better service quality, and better relations to patients and next of kin. Extraordinary care should be taken to identify and mitigate potential risks in machine learning systems. Avoiding harm begins with careful consideration of potential impacts on all those affected by decisions. Although it is sometimes overlooked, Pritchard and other researchers remind us that informed consent should be more than a form — it should be a process. The client or employer may decide to pursue the assignment with the professional after additional time to acquire the necessary competencies, to pursue the assignment with someone else who has the required expertise, or to forgo the assignment. When that harm is unintended, those responsible are obliged to undo or mitigate the harm as much as possible. One participant used the word character formation, feeling that the deliberations they have in the ethics reflection groups create professional development among colleagues over time. Cooperation rather than coercion Participants say they are changing their perspective by starting to ask themselves why coercion is necessary. The revised Code of Ethics addresses the significant advances in computing technology since the version, as well as the growing pervasiveness of computing in all aspects of society. The theoretical foundation of systematic ethics reflection — discourse ethics and hermeneutics — contributes to keeping the moral space open, and being sensitive to both the often implicit or hidden moral dimension of everyday work, and how presuppositions of what is taken for granted or seen as necessary or morally good can be deconstructed and challenged, in order to stimulate free and critical thinking.
The most common topics were the use of coercion, interaction with relatives, and decisions about treatment intensity.
based on 77 review